Frank Rich On ABC's "Tawdry" Debate

As usual Frank Rich doesn't mince words in looking at ABC's Debate:

Shoddy! Tawdry! A Televised Train Wreck!

Of course, Obama fans were angry because of the barrage of McCarthyesque guilt-by-association charges against their candidate, portraying him as a fellow traveler of bomb-throwing, America-hating, flag-denigrating terrorists.

This line of attack trys to ignore the fact that America's most dammaging traitors now occupy our White House.

Ludicrous as the whole spectacle was, ABC would not have been so widely pilloried had it not tapped into a larger national discontent with news media fatuousness. The debate didn't happen in a vacuum; it was the culmination of the orgy of press hysteria over Mr. Obama's remarks about "bitter" small-town voters. For nearly a week, you couldn't change channels without hearing how Mr. Obama had destroyed his campaign with this single slip at a San Francisco fund-raiser. By Wednesday night, the public was overdosing.

I agree that Americans are fed up with this kind of hysterical trivia reaching a saturation point in the media.

But the overreaction to this latest gaffe backfired on the media more than it damaged him. For all the racket about "Bittergate" -- and breathless intimations of imminent poll swings and superdelegate stampedes -- the earth did not move. The polls hardly budged, and superdelegates continued to migrate mainly in Mr. Obama's direction.

Thus did another overhyped 2008 story line go embarrassingly bust, like such predecessors as the death of the John McCain campaign and the organizational and financial invincibility of the Clinton political machine against a rookie senator from Illinois. Not the least of the reasons that the Beltway has gotten so much wrong this year is that it believes that 2008 is still 1988. It sees the country in its own image -- static -- instead of as a dynamic society whose culture and demographics are changing by the day.

If the Beltway establishment thinks that the Obama campaign will be derailed by some media hysteria over trivial gaffes they better think again.

The most revealing moment in Wednesday's debate was a striking example of this media-populace disconnect. In Mr. Gibson's only passionate query of the night, he tried to strong-arm both Democrats into forgoing any increases in the capital gains tax. The capital gains tax! That's just the priority Americans are focusing on as they lose their houses and jobs, and as gas prices reach $4 a gallon (a subject that merited only a brief mention, in a lightning round of final questions). And this in a debate that took place on the same day we learned that the top 50 hedge fund managers made a total of $29 billion in 2007, some of them by betting against the mortgage market.

This is why Obama will cut McCain off at his arthritic knees and it was totaly ignored by StepOnTopOfUs and company.

Next to such knuckleheaded obtuseness, Mr. Obama's pratfall may strike many voters as a misdemeanor. He was probably rescued as well by the typical Clinton campaign overkill that followed his mistake. Not content merely to piously feign shock about Mr. Obama's San Francisco soliloquy (and the operative political buzzword here is San Francisco, which stands for you-know-what), Mrs. Clinton couldn't resist presenting herself as an unambiguously macho, beer-swilling hunting enthusiast. This is as condescending as it gets, topping even Mitt Romney's last-ditch effort to repackage himself to laid-off union workers as the love child of Joe Hill and Norma Rae.

Rich then looks at how McCain isn't being vetted by a press too busy with a media feeding frenzy on Democratic side. Things like Cindy McCain's estimated fortune even bigger than the Clintons', and McCain's delay in releasing his health records.

The whole Rich peice is a real gem. I urge you to read the whole thing.

crosposted at D-Kos

Display:


Re: Frank Rich On ABC's "Tawdry" Debate (2.00 / 3)

Indeed, excellent diary. Kudos to you, sir!


Hooray for John McCain!
by ragekage on Sun Apr 20, 2008 at 09:27:08 PM EST

Re: Frank Rich On ABC's "Tawdry" Debate (none / 0)

Frank Rich sides with Obama? Stop the presses!!


Fortune strums a mournful tune for those whose campaigns peak too soon. --Bored of the Rings
by Inky on Sun Apr 20, 2008 at 09:29:33 PM EST

Re: Frank Rich On ABC's "Tawdry" Debate (none / 0)

Hey. Can you do me a favor and, using numbers, refute this?


My candidate lost fair and square. So did yours. Get over it and let's kick McSame's ass!
by RLMcCauley on Sun Apr 20, 2008 at 11:10:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Frank Rich On ABC's "Tawdry" Debate (none / 0)

I don't have to. Big Tent Democrat over on TalkLeft already did.


Fortune strums a mournful tune for those whose campaigns peak too soon. --Bored of the Rings
by Inky on Sun Apr 20, 2008 at 11:36:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Frank Rich On ABC's "Tawdry" Debate (none / 0)

I don't see any numbers over there. Maybe I'm unable to access the full post. Please post the numbers here.


My candidate lost fair and square. So did yours. Get over it and let's kick McSame's ass!
by RLMcCauley on Mon Apr 21, 2008 at 12:48:12 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Frank Rich On ABC's "Tawdry" Debate (2.00 / 1)

awesome diary!  Frank is right yet again!!!


She and McCain are very close - Bill Clinton
by clintonmccain on Sun Apr 20, 2008 at 10:12:00 PM EST

Re: Frank Rich On ABC's "Tawdry" Debate (none / 0)

Great find.  Rich digs in here and delivers.  Of course, you will get your share of Clinton supporters denying the logic within and dismissing these words as those of just another MSM hack in the tank for Obama.  Let them paint themselves into a corner.  Keep up the good work.


by haystax calhoun on Sun Apr 20, 2008 at 11:52:21 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.